On November 18 I crossed a threshold, with respect to 4D theory. I realized what is wrong about the question, “What is the Fourth Dimension?” The issue is definition, the solution is indefinite. There is no such thing as THE 4th Dimension. A fourth dimension can be introduced to practically any 3D (or less than 4D) formulation. One can deploy 4D for a host of reasons or functions. 4D serves basically as an X Factor for solving imaginary problems with actual implications. [CONTEXT: Research centered on two primary sources (James Bridle and Buckminster Fuller) and multiple secondary sources (Joe Rogan interviews with Malcolm Gladwell, Ed Snowden and others…
A 4th dimension can be introduced to a calculation as a means for representing Time, but 4D is not TIME itself, and certainly not only Time. A fourth dimension could be 'weight’ in a height x width x depth description of an object. The 4D feature could be location in a name x race x gender description of a person. [ ^ Referential notations > The Soto exhibit at Guggenheim Bilbao; Exposing the Invisible; CAA Journal Editor’s Note “Materiality, Sign of the Times”…
We add fourth dimensions to all kinds of concepts and constructs all the time. It’s helpful to recall that dimension is rooted in the idea of measurement. Things get tricky when we start to try to measure “things” like space, or energy, or time, and even trickier when we try to measure spirit, experience and perception like things. { ^ Externalities > The Venice Biennale closed due to “second-worst flood ever recorded.” Other major stories include: the percolating China-USA trade war; continuing unrest in many nations; the controversial entrance of Michael Bloomberg into the Democratic primaries; Trump impeachment; British Royal Prince Andrew swept away in post-Epstein-murder scandal…
Blame Latin, and that confounded res. [ ^ Echoes > Descartes’ res extensa and res cogitans; obviously res publica; in media res ~ a device that continues to inform creative narrative as an immersive time-flattening technique; philosophical conduits thread through Aristotelian Truth, and, indeed, a plethora of objective traditions’ conceptual superimpositions…
It would not be incorrect to think of 4D as a catch-all dimension, nor would it be false to say that 4D is an additive space for merging properties into complex structures. It would be near impossible to say anything false about 4D, given that the dimension can serve as a transitional container for projection.
A fourth dimension facilitates expansion from our concept of THE strictly material or abstract universe into one that is more realistic in its proportions.
Since the early 1980s, I have identified as a 4D artist. I have been asked hundreds, if not thousands of times, “What is 4D?”
The reduction of the proposition of four dimensions for universal theory and applications to Time has clearly proved insufficient. Human enterprise and perceptual evolution has generated a tremendous variety of complex situations. A functional idea of a 4th Dimension facilitates development and innovation in all directions, across disciplines and within social sectors. 4D has compelling implications for the individual, too.
My primary interest in 4D is artistic. In pursuing an improved understanding of the 4th Dimension, I have found common cause with a broad range of practitioners whose primary interests are not art. Yet, through collaboration and discourse, we have discovered that 4D has qualities that are valuable in multiple enterprises. An important by-product of these 4D exchanges has consistently been an enhanced appreciation of one’s collaborator, his discipline and thinking. Further, by working and thinking together, in an era of shared technology, we now find ourselves using many of the same 4D tools for visualization, communication and production.